Bombay HC Quashes Pune Society’s Self-Redevelopment Resolution Over Minority Rights

Court Orders Fresh Meeting, Fair Buyouts, And Audits To Protect Dissenting Members

In a landmark judgment dated July 15, 2025, the Bombay High Court delivered a significant ruling in Writ Petition No. 6789 of 2025 — Minority Flat Owners Association vs. Majority Members of Shanti Nagar CHS Ltd. & Ors. — reinforcing minority safeguards in self-redevelopment projects under the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 (MCS Act).

The dispute arose from Shanti Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., Pune, which, after obtaining deemed conveyance in 2020, passed a special resolution with 70% approval in March 2025 to undertake self-redevelopment of its 50-year-old building. The project was to be financed through bank loans and member contributions, bypassing external developers.

However, 12 dissenting members (30%) challenged the move, alleging violations of Section 79A of the MCS Act. They argued that the plan lacked cost transparency, ignored their financial limitations, and undervalued FSI (Floor Space Index) benefits. They also warned of forced eviction risks for those unable to pay. The majority, meanwhile, cited the 2019 Self-Redevelopment Guidelines, which permit majority decisions, and claimed ownership rights post-deemed conveyance.

After the Registrar of Co-operative Societies upheld the resolution, the minority group approached the High Court, alleging arbitrariness and breach of natural justice.

Court’s Observations

The bench found that while Section 97 of the MCS Act allows redevelopment by majority vote, cooperative principles of equity and fairness must guide such decisions. The court observed that the society’s ₹15 crore proposal lacked independent audits, transparent FSI valuation, and feasibility reports, violating members’ right to equality under Article 14 of the Constitution.

Citing Hill Properties Ltd. vs. Union Bank of India and Olga Tellis vs. BMC, the bench emphasized that self-redevelopment must not disproportionately burden seniors, low-income, or minority owners. It clarified that while a 70% majority can initiate redevelopment, the execution phase must resolve objections through mediation and inclusive planning.

Court’s Orders

1. Resolution Quashed: The March 2025 resolution was annulled.
2. New Meeting: The society must reconvene within 60 days with revised terms.
3. Valuation & Buyout: A government-approved valuer must assess FSI; dissenters to be offered 1.5x circle rate buyouts or rehabilitation housing.
4. Audit & Oversight: Mandatory third-party audits, phased contributions, and Registrar monitoring with RERA involvement if costs exceed ₹10 crore.
5. Penalty: ₹1.5 lakh imposed on the society, split between a minority relief fund and audit compliance.

Broader Significance

The verdict bridges legal and moral accountability, setting a precedent for over 1,500 societies in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region (MMR) pursuing self-redevelopment. It underscores that deemed conveyance does not nullify cooperative democracy, and that collective ownership must not override individual fairness.

This ruling is expected to restore faith in self-redevelopment by enforcing financial transparency, inclusive planning, and minority protection — vital steps toward safer and equitable housing renewal in Maharashtra’s aging cooperative sector.

---